IF you are sick of the lies, excuses and nonsense from your government, then please print and mail this letter to your local elected Sheriff.
You can send this to other elected officials also, but your Sheriff is the one person that has the authority to take this to the top.
Dear ______,
I am writing in complaint of the abuse our form of government is prosecuting on our people.
I know why the system is failing.
Because we are not being represented properly by the process, not as individuals and not as a nation. The two ARE related, but the reasons are separate.
Step one:
If you want equal rights, we agree.
We all have the equal right to be properly represented in government.
If I vote for one guy, because I agree with the decisions he promises to make, and I do not vote for the other guy, because I disagree with the decisions that he promises to make, and that other guy wins that election
then
I am not being represented equally.
Hear me out, if YOU voted for that other guy, the guy that won the election, YOU get represented. NOT ME!!!
Now, wait. If the guy I voted for wins, that means that I get represented.
But if you voted for the other guy, and he loses, that means that you are not getting represented.
What happened to those equal rights?
Oh? That’s just the way the system works?
Well, that’s just an excuse for the fact that we are NOT being represented. It does not mean we ARE being represented.
It’s just an EXCUSE.
Sorry, but I thought we AGREED we have equal rights, and now you are telling me to IGNORE that the system does not PROVIDE equal right of representation???
No.
Step two
Allow me to clarify.
If we elect someone to represent the majority of people within a district, it is possible, perhaps even likely that many decisions made by that representative will factually represent the majority of people in that district.
That would be fine, if we had some way to determine if each decision made by that person elected DID represent the majority.
We do not.
What we do have is the “plan”, that suggests that if the elected person makes enough decisions that majority disagrees with, then it may be probable that person is not re-elected.
I really would like you to consider that carefully.
The person elected, must make decisions that the majority disagree with, and enough of those decisions to incite the public to vote for someone else.
In other words, the plan is, that, we get misrepresented until next election, and then we try someone else.
What kind of nonsense is that?
Seriously.
Step three:
I would like you to consider another facet of our “great” system that totally fails.
I said above, “That would be fine, if we had some way to determine if each decision made by that person elected DID represent the majority.”
However that is not true EITHER!
Imagine 3 districts, no parties, no money, absolute honest elections and everyone votes.
Each district elects a representative and that representative is required, by law to represent the majority of the people in that district.
District one, 4999 people said “yes”, 5001 said “no”.
The majority said no.
District two, 5003 said “yes”, 4997 said “no”.
The majority said yes.
District three, 4999 people said “yes”, 5001 said “no”.
The majority said no.
The majority of the people, 15,001 of them said YES!
The minority, Only 14,999 said no.
The representatives voted two to one and the decision of CONGRESS, was NO.
The MAJORITY of the people said YES!!
What kind of nonsense system is that, huh??
You tell me.
Our current constitution fails to provide the means to properly administer three core concepts we were told would be provided by our form of government.
Individual representation, representation as a nation, and protection from tyranny of majority.
We demand that you, take the necessary steps to remedy our complaint.
One: Recognize the failures inherent in our constitutional process caused by the flaws noted above within that process.
Two: Demand an immediate consideration of new process alternatives.
Three: Demand those alternative processes considered be developed, tested, debugged and refined.
Four: Demonstrate those systems, once designed to the public.
Five: Require that our current government abide by whatever choice that a majority of our public decides to use. By direct vote of the entire public citizenry.
We are making this set of demands as a remedy for abuse.
We are proposing consideration of a new alternative process modeled on the proposal contained at this link.
REPUBLIC:
“a state in which supreme power is held by the people”
https://www.facebook.com/notes/mike-anderson/need-a-new-government/10155645258522278/
Posted by Mike Anderson on Thursday, October 5, 2017